A normal Syntegration is already a disciplined way to distribute thought without collapsing into hierarchy. But many real public questions require something more. They require a second chamber able to carry the voices that are usually weakly represented in ordinary deliberation. The bicameral structure introduces that second chamber without breaking the first. The 30-person inner chamber remains the engine of distributed discussion. The 12-person outer jury becomes a chamber of archetypal witness. This means Jury Syntegration can preserve the elegance of the icosahedral method while extending its ethical, ecological, historical, and future-facing range.